Zero Capex Solar for South African Business: Pay-for-Performance PPAs that Deliver Cost Savings with No Upfront Investment

Purchase cheaper solar energy per kWh with no upfront investment.

By Next Renewable Generation

Executive summary

Zero capex solar means you host a solar PV (photovoltaic) generating asset but do not pay for the asset. Unlike a take-or-pay PPA (Power Purchase Agreement), in a pay-for-performance PPA, you pay only for verified kWh delivered at an agreed R/kWh tariff, so savings can be realised immediately from commissioning. The model is typically best suited to sites with a strong daytime consumption profile. Performance and maintenance obligations in the PPA remain with the IPP (Independent Power Producer). 

Definitions and compliance in South Africa

Next Renewable Generation describes a commercial solar PPA as an IPP funded, owned, and operated facility on your premises that sells you energy at an agreed R/kWh tariff for a set term, often 10 to 20 years. 

On the regulatory side, the licensing exemption and registration framework is defined in the amended Schedule 2 of the South African Electricity Regulation Act (Act 4 of 2006) as gazetted by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, and it is commonly implemented through distributor connection rules and registration processes.  Requirements vary by distributor and municipality, so your compliance pathway must be confirmed for your specific point of supply. 

A key practical point comes from NERSA(National Energy Regulator of South Africa): if your embedded generation facility has a point of connection to the electricity grid, registration obligations are based on the facility’s installed capacity and not on whether energy is exported or consumed on site. NERSA states that systems of 100 kW or less register with the relevant distributor (Eskom or the municipality), and systems above 100 kW register directly with NERSA, while facilities with no point of connection to the grid are exempt from registration requirements. 

How the pay-for-performance PPA works

You are the facility host and the energy offtaker. The IPP funds and owns the facility, appoints the EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) contractor for construction, and remains responsible for monitoring and operations and maintenance for the term of the PPA. Payments should be based on verified kWh delivered, not a fixed monthly repayments, to keep the arrangement performance based. 

A well structured PPA should include accurate energy metering, often a main and check meter, clear performance standards, and defined remedies if standards are not met.

Project steps:

(Scoll)

1
LOAD AND
TARIFF
ANALYSIS
2
SITE SURVEY
AND GRID
PRE-CHECK
3
PPA PROPOSAL:
TARIFF AND
GUARANTEES
4
APPROVALS
AND
REGISTRATION
5
BUILD AND
COMMISSIONING
6
MONITORING AND
OPERATIONS AND
MANAGEMENT

Financial value in South Africa with stated assumptions

All currency below is in  ZAR (R), VAT excluded, unless stated.

A NERSA-approved municipal tariff schedule shows tariffs for small commercial energy charges could be within range R3.92 to R4.12 per kWh.  Against a grid tariff basis like this, PPA tariffs for embedded solar can be compelling because the PPA tariff is able to undercut and beat the customer’s daytime cost of grid energy. 

For indicative PPA deal economics, GreenCape benchmarking notes that an embedded PPA can be priced as much as 30% cheaper per kWh than existing Eskom or municipal tariffs (your actual savings realised depends on your tariff structure, time-of-use exposure, and load profile). 

Assumptions used above (illustrative): avoided energy charge R3.50/kWh, PPA tariff R1.20/kWh, PV yield 1,600 to 1,800 kWh/kWp/year (site dependent).  Under these assumptions, each self-consumed solar kWh saves about R2.30.

Tax note: (ownership-dependent): The South African Revenue Service’s Section 12B regulation allows for a 100% first-year deduction for qualifying PV generation assets not exceeding 1 MW brought into use for the first time. Under a PPA, the IPP usually owns the asset, so the benefit of such tax deductions are typically priced into an improved PPA tariff rather than claimed by the offtaker. 

Operational impact, suitability, and common risks

A PPA keeps solar off your maintenance workbook. The IPP maintains the facility and bears performance risk, and longer-term PPA models allocate routine Operations and Maintenance responsibilities to the seller for the term of the PPA.

South Africa-specific Operations and Maintenance best-practice guidelines and practices supported by SAPVIA emphasise monitoring, documentation, and consistent Operations and Maintenance execution as central to delivering expected facility performance over time.  

Best-fit sites usually have good alignment of daytime site load and solar generation profiles, with suitable roof or carport space (condition and shading), and a clear grid-connection pathway aligned to local distributor rules. 

Common objections and mitigations:

  • Longer duration PPA terms – mitigate with assignment provisions and clear end-of-term options (extend, buy, or remove). Longer PPA terms, mitigate this by including clear transfer terms if business circumstances change, and by defining end-of-term options such as extend, buy, or remove.
  • Tariff restructuring – mitigate with conservative modelling and self-consumption-first system sizing. 
  • Load-shedding expectations – mitigate by specifying storage and an appropriate backup architecture if continuity is required (this changes design, approvals, and pricing). 

Financing options comparison:

Option

Upfront investment How you pay Who owns

Performance risk

PPA low or none per metered kWh IPP mostly IPP
Lease low to moderate fixed monthly often transfers shared
Loan moderate loan + Operations and Maintenance you you
Purchase high minimal ongoing you you

*The above may vary depending on the specific contract terms.

Do offtakers pay when the system is down?

A pay-for-performance PPA should bill off-takers only on metered kWh, with performance remedies defined up front.

What approvals do we need?

Distributor connection approval and registration aligned to NERSA facility capacity thresholds, plus technical compliance for grid connection.

Will solar work during load shedding?

Not unless designed and scope at the outset for backup, specify storage and changeover if you need continuity of supply.

What happens at the end of PPA term?

Extend, buy, or remove, define this in the PPA terms before signing.

Can we claim tax incentives?

Usually the asset owner claims capital allowances, confirming handling with your tax advisor.

Next Renewable Generation delivers zero-capex, pay-for-performance PPAs, supported from early feasibility through to commissioning and ongoing facility operations. By sharing twelve months of energy bills and, where available, demand data, we can develop a tailored savings model with clear assumptions, together with draft PPA terms covering tariff, metering, and performance guarantees.

An alternative for grid-scale energy storage, the sodium-ion battery

In the renewable energy industry, integrating energy storage is essential to address seasonal and intermittent variations in generation such as reduced solar output in winter or inconsistent wind supply. It also ensures the reliable delivery of power. Among the available options, electrochemical batteries quickly gained attention because they offered high efficiency, scalability, and compactness, making them suitable for both grid applications and consumer electronics (Dong, et al., 2024).

In the 1970s and 1980s, research into electrochemical energy storage solutions began, with sodium, lithium, and other elements investigated as potential charge carriers for these batteries. Because lithium-ion offered a high energy density, it was selected as the preferred charge carrier. Therefore, the alternatives were set aside in favour of further research and development of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). In 1991, Sony launched the first commercialization of LIBs (Buonomenna & Bae, 2017). Today, LIBs are found in nearly every type of electronic battery application, from smartphones to electric vehicles (EVs) and grid storage.

With a mature manufacturing infrastructure, LIB manufacturers have made significant progress in enhancing performance and reducing costs. Modern LIBs exhibit low self-discharge rates (~1.5% per month) and a long cycle life of 500–1000 cycles (Pilali, et al., 2025). The cost of LIBs has fallen dramatically, from around US$7,500/kWh per cell in 1991 to approximately US$120/kWh per pack in 2025 (Ritchie, 2021). Although LIBs offer many benefits, they also exhibit drawbacks that make them a less favourable option for energy storage. The reduction in cost to around US$120/kWh is impressive, but LIBs remain relatively expensive, particularly for utility-scale projects where developers aim for substantially lower prices to ensure economic viability. In addition to cost, the growing global demand for lithium creates supply constraints and price volatility, while extraction and processing can have environmental impacts. Recycling LIBs also remains technically challenging and expensive, further limiting their long-term sustainability. This highlights the need for alternative, more sustainable battery chemistries.

The financial aspect is a critical factor for project developers in determining whether a project is viable. Due to the high cost and limited availability of lithium, manufacturers and developers have been compelled to seek alternatives that not only reduce costs for consumers but also provide energy storage solutions that are more sustainable and environmentally friendly.

Today we can’t only care about high performing batteries but need to think about it holistically. We need to consider how we can create cost-effective and sustainable solutions in order to get energy to all without compromising the future of this planet. Thus, the focus would lie in a low cost, high performing energy storage system with effective recycling processes in place.

Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been considered a promising next-generation alternative due to their widespread availability and their chemical similarity to LIBs (Gao, et al., 2023). In recent years, SIBs have gradually resurfaced as an optimal replacement for LIBs. The raw sodium material used in SIBs is about 30% cheaper than lithium, making them less costly to produce overall. SIBs are currently priced between $75–$100 per kWh at the pack level (IDTechEx Ltd, 2024), depending on chemistry and scale. This makes SIBs a more affordable option compared to LIBs which, yet again, are priced around $120/kWh at the pack level. This is noteworthy for utility-scale projects where cost-effectiveness is of the utmost importance. Furthermore, SIBs are easier to source, present a lower environmental risk, and offer a longer cycle life, typically ranging from 2,000 to 4,000 cycles (Pilali, et al., 2025). Moreover, because SIBs share similar chemistry with LIBs, making it possible to leverage much of the existing LIB manufacturing processes, however, materials, supply chains, and quality control may require adaption.

SIBs have been proven in the field, making them more than a theoretical solution. From an early experimental trial of a 100 kWh Na-ion battery which was launched in 2019 (Chinese Academy of Science, 2019) at the Yangtze River Delta Physics Research Centre in Liyang city, China, to the first grid-scale installation of a 200 MWh Na-ion battery in Nanning, China. This installation was commissioned by the Chinese Southern Power Grid Energy Storage (CSG) company in 2024 (Green Building Africa, 2025), which forms part of a hybrid lithium-sodium battery with a capacity of 400 MWh. These real deployments demonstrate feasibility at both pilot and utility scales, underscoring that the remaining questions related to performance trade-offs, bankability, and system-level constraints.

Although SIBs offer several benefits, they also exhibit drawbacks, but their main challenge lies in energy density, typically 100-160 Wh/kg compared to 180-250 Wh/kg for LIBs such as lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate batteries. The lower energy density makes SIBs less suitable for applications where compact size is critical, such as consumer electronics (e.g. smartphones) and electric vehicles (EVs). However, because the renewable energy sector does not face the same size constraints SIBs represent a highly viable solution for stationary energy storage in this field. Another disadvantage SIBs have compared to LIBs is their self-discharge rate. LIBs currently achieve around 1.5% per month (UoW – CEI, 2025), slightly lower than the rate of 2–3% per month seen in SIBs (Erik, 2023). However, as SIB technology is still in its early stages, further research will likely bring this rate down, potentially below that of LIBs.

LIBs remain the leading energy storage technology due to their high energy density, low self-discharge rate, and reliability. However, the high cost and limited availability of lithium make them less sustainable in the long term. SIBs present a promising alternative, offering affordability and resource availability that position them well for grid-scale applications.

Going forward, LIBs are likely to retain dominance in portable electronics and high-performance EVs, while SIBs are expected to excel in stationary energy storage. Together, these technologies will serve complementary roles in advancing sustainable and cost-effective energy solutions for the future.

To highlight the strengths and drawbacks between lithium-ion (LIB) and sodium-ion (SIB) batteries, the table below represents a side-by-side comparison of key specifications between these two battery chemistries.

LIB SIB
Energy Density (Wh/kg) 180–250 100–160
Cycle Life (cycles) 500–1,000 2,000–4,000
Self-Discharge Rate (%) 1.5% 2–3%
Cost per kWh (pack level) $120 $75–$100
Primary Applications Mobility and portable electronics Stationary grid storage
References:
  • Buonomenna, M. G. & Bae, J., 2017. Sodium-Ion Batteries: A Realistic Alternative to Lithium-Ion Batteries?. Nanoscience and Nanotechnology – Asia, pp. 139-154.
  • Chinese Academy of Science, 2019. China First Demonstrates the 100 kWh Na-Ion Battery System for Energy Storage, Beijing: Chinese Academy of Science.
  • Dong, Z., Li, L. & Li, Y., 2024. The problems with solid-state sodium ion battery electrolytes and their solutions, China: EDP Sciences.
  • Erik, 2023. Sodium Ion vs Lithium Ion Batteries. [Online] Available at:
    https://www.offroadchampions.com/blogs/sodium-ion-vs-lithium-ion-batteries/ [Accessed 1 October 2025].
  • Gao, Y. et al., 2023. A 30-year overview of sodium-ion batteries, s.l.: Wiley.
  • Green Building Africa, 2025. First large-scale hybrid lithium-sodium battery energy storage facility commissioned in China. [Online] Available at:
    Green Building Africa
  • IDTechEx Ltd, 2024. Sodium-ion Batteries 2024–2034: Technology, Players, Markets, and Forecasts, s.l.: IDTechEx.
  • Pilali, E. et al., 2025. SWOT analysis on the transition from Lithium-Ion batteries to. Elsevier, pp. 1–16.
  • Ritchie, H., 2021. The price of batteries has declined by 97% in the last three decades. Our World in Data.
  • UoW – CEI, 2025. Lithium Ion Battery. [Online] Available at:
    https://www.cei.washington.edu/research/energy-storage/lithium-ion-battery/

NrG’s Water & Energy Initiative: Sustainable Solutions for St. Dominic’s School

 

Facing the growing challenges of energy insecurity and water scarcity in South Africa, St. Dominic’s School for Girls in Boksburg has taken a significant step toward long-term resilience and sustainability. Through a comprehensive initiative led by Next Renewable Generation (NrG), the school has implemented an integrated solar PV and battery storage system alongside a reliable backup water supply and filtration solution, ensuring uninterrupted learning and operational continuity, even during power outages and water disruptions.

The project demonstrates how renewable energy and smart water management can be combined to create real, measurable impact. serving as a strong model for other schools, institutions, and businesses looking to adopt sustainable, self-sufficient solutions.

The solar energy system, designed as an AC-coupled hybrid, combines high-efficiency Canadian Solar PV panels with lithium-ion battery storage, seamlessly integrated with the school’s existing diesel generator for added reliability. Real-time monitoring through Schneider Electric’s PME LTE system allows for ongoing performance tracking, empowering the school to manage energy use proactively. The system not only protects the school from load-shedding but also significantly reduces electricity costs and diesel consumption. A savings investigation was conducted and projected a yearly grid energy savings of R792 195 and diesel cost savings of R446 000, which results in a total R1 238 195 annually. Table 1 below presents the specifications of the system.

Table 1: Solar PV Specifications

Component Specification
Solar PV system size 203.6 kWp DC
Solar panels 354 x Canadian solar (575 W)
Annual Energy Yield 334,6 MWh
Inverters 1 x ATESS PCS 500, 2 x Huawei 50 kW, 1 x Huawei 100 kW AC coupled
Battery system Freedom won 300/240 HV+

To tackle the growing challenge of water reliability in schools, a comprehensive backup water system was implemented, addressing both capacity and quality. The solution features a dual-borehole setup with a combined storage capacity of 150,000 litres, ensuring a dependable supply even during municipal outages. Advanced filtration using Activated Filter Media (AFM) and ultraviolet (UV) sterilisation guarantees that the water meets SANS 241 standards for potable use. The system is fully automated, incorporating level sensors and pressure-boosting pumps to maintain consistent flow and operational safety. By securing access to clean water for key campus facilities, this initiative not only builds resilience but also sets a benchmark for infrastructure planning in educational environments. Figure 1 below shows the design of the backup water system.

Figure 1:  Backup water system

What makes this initiative especially relevant is its twofold impact: reducing operational disruptions and building a platform for long-term financial and environmental sustainability. Through a root-cause analysis, the project revealed that the school’s swimming pool was losing up to 50,000 litres of water per day due to an incorrectly configured balance tank.

With water costing R60 per kilolitre, this translates to nearly R1 million in potential annual losses. Through immediate corrective actions, including tank level adjustments, replacing faulty check valves, and raising overflow pipes, those losses have now been drastically reduced. This highlights just how important it is to prioritise water efficiency and take a proactive approach to managing infrastructure, especially in environments where resources can be stretched.

By identifying the issue early and acting quickly, the school was able to prevent major losses and ensure a more sustainable operation. It’s a clear example of how routine audits and small adjustments can lead to big savings and long-term benefits. Figure 2 shows how the cost of water decreased from around R130 000, at the start of the project, to just over R80 000 at the end of the project.

Figure 2: Overall Cost Per Month

Table 1 below presents the specifications of the system.

Component Specification
New Boreholes Installed 2
Storage Tank Capacity 2 x 150 000 litres
Water Filtration System Activated Filter Media (AFM)
Backup Water Sources Borehole, municipal and swimming pool

Beyond its technical achievements, the project sends a powerful message: schools, businesses, and institutions nationwide have a genuine opportunity to future-proof their operations by adopting renewable energy and improving water resilience. These solutions offer more than just protection against short-term disruptions, they also promote long-term cost stability, environmental responsibility, and greater independence from unreliable public infrastructure.

As South Africa continues to face systemic electricity and water challenges, projects like the one at St. Dominic’s School offer a proven template. These upgrades are more than just improvements, they’re investments in reliability, sustainability, and peace of mind. For schools, hospitals, commercial buildings, and community centres, adopting similar systems isn’t just a technical decision—it’s a forward-thinking strategy for long-term success.

Photo Gallery:

 

Introduction

In the Commercial & Industrial (C&I) sector, the adoption of solar energy projects is gaining momentum as businesses seek to reduce energy costs, improve sustainability, and hedge against energy price volatility. However, the successful implementation of these projects hinges on a well-structured Request for Proposal (RFP) process. An effective RFP process ensures that the right vendors are selected, projects are completed on time and within budget, and the expected energy savings and environmental benefits are realized.

To achieve these outcomes, clients, advisors, and other stakeholders must approach the RFP process with greater rigor and a deeper understanding of its complexities. This involves:

  1. Comprehensive Feasibility Studies: Assessing technical, financial, and regulatory aspects to ensure the project is viable from the outset.
  2. Detailed Preliminary Design: Developing a robust preliminary design that accurately reflects the site conditions and project requirements.
  3. Clear and Comprehensive RFP Documentation: Providing potential bidders with all necessary information and clear evaluation criteria to facilitate accurate and competitive proposals.
  4. Inclusion of PPA Terms: For projects undertaken as Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), clearly outlining the terms and conditions to attract credible and financially stable bidders.
  5. Stakeholder Engagement: Ensuring that all relevant parties, including regulatory bodies, community groups, and internal teams, are involved early in the process to address potential challenges and streamline approvals.

Flowchart of the RFP Process for C&I Solar Projects

Detailed Steps

1. Conduct Feasibility Study

  • Site Assessment: Evaluate potential sites, considering solar irradiance, roof or land availability, shading, and structural integrity.
  • Technical Feasibility: Assess grid connectivity, infrastructure needs, and potential challenges specific to C&I sites.
  • Financial Feasibility: Estimate project costs, potential funding sources, and expected ROI. Evaluate the financial viability of a PPA model.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Ensure compliance with local, regional, and national regulations. Obtain necessary permits and approvals.

2. Develop Preliminary Design

  • System Design: Create a preliminary design for the solar system, including the layout of solar panels, inverters, and other components tailored for C&I applications.
  • Energy Yield Analysis: Estimate expected energy production based on the preliminary design and site conditions.
  • Technical Specifications: Define technical specifications for key components, such as solar panels, inverters, and mounting structures.
  • Budget Estimate: Provide a preliminary budget estimate based on the design and specifications, including financial models for both direct purchase and PPA options.

3. Develop RFP Document

  • Project Overview: Include a detailed description of the project, its objectives, and scope. Highlight the benefits of the solar project for the C&I sector.
  • Technical Requirements: Specify technical requirements and standards that bidders must meet, including performance metrics and system warranties.
  • PPA Terms: Outline terms and conditions for the PPA, including pricing, contract duration, and termination clauses.
  • Submission Guidelines: Outline format and content requirements for proposals, including deadlines and submission procedures.
  • Evaluation Criteria: Define criteria and weightings for proposal evaluation, considering both technical and financial aspects.

4. Include General Bid Conditions

  • Bid Bond: Specify requirement for a bid bond to ensure serious bids.
  • Performance Bond: Detail performance bond requirements to guarantee project completion.
  • Warranty Requirements: Specify warranty terms for equipment and installation services, tailored to the C&I market.
  • Timeline: Provide expected project timeline, including key milestones and deadlines.
  • Payment Terms: Outline payment schedule and terms for the awarded contract, considering both direct purchase and PPA models.
  • Contract Terms: Include general terms and conditions of the contract that will be awarded.

Challenges and Constraints

For Project Owners/Developers:

  • Comprehensive Feasibility: Ensuring thorough feasibility studies specific to C&I sites, which can vary widely in terms of roof conditions, shading, and energy needs.
  • Accurate Preliminary Design: Developing a preliminary design that accurately reflects the project scope and constraints can be challenging without detailed site data.
  • Detailed Bid Conditions: Defining comprehensive and clear bid conditions to avoid ambiguity and ensure fair evaluation can be complex.
  • PPA Contracting: Structuring a PPA that is financially viable and acceptable to all stakeholders can be challenging.

For Vendors/Suppliers:

  • Adhering to Requirements: Meeting all technical, financial, and regulatory requirements in the RFP can be demanding.
  • Proposal Costs: The detailed information required in the RFP can increase the time and cost of proposal preparation.
  • Competitive Pressure: Balancing competitive pricing with the need to meet all bid conditions and ensure project viability.

For PPA Providers:

  • Risk Management: Assessing and managing the financial and operational risks associated with long-term PPA contracts.
  • Customer Creditworthiness: Evaluating the creditworthiness of C&I customers to ensure reliable payments over the contract term.
  • Regulatory Changes: Adapting to regulatory changes that could impact the financial attractiveness of PPAs.

Addressing Challenges

  1. Thorough Planning: Investing time in detailed feasibility studies and preliminary design to reduce uncertainties later in the process.
  2. Clear Documentation: Providing clear and detailed RFP documents and bid conditions to ensure vendors understand requirements.
  3. Stakeholder Collaboration: Engaging stakeholders early to align expectations and address potential challenges collaboratively.
  4. Realistic Timelines: Allowing adequate time for each phase of the process, from feasibility studies to vendor evaluation, to ensure thorough and accurate work.
  5. PPA Structuring: Working with experienced financial and legal advisors to structure PPAs that balance risk and reward for both parties.

By approaching the RFP process with this level of rigor and understanding, stakeholders can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of solar projects in the C&I space, ensuring successful outcomes and long-term benefits.

Drinking water is becoming an increasingly scarce resource in South Africa, and Gauteng has been hitting the headlines most recently due to the number and duration of water supply interruptions being experienced. Interestingly, the water shortages are not so much because of inadequate raw water supply from the storage dams, but because of failing supply and delivery infrastructures within the cities. The failing infrastructures are, however, having a significant negative impact on the storage dam reserves.

A common industry benchmark to measure the efficiency of the water supply network is the percentage of Non-Revenue Water (NRW) that is lost before delivery to the consumer. The losses are typically due to leaks, theft, and metering faults.  Most provinces lose more than a third of their water supply. The international benchmark is below 30%, and only the Western Cape is inside the benchmark at 29.6%.  Gauteng is second best at ~40% – the rest of the provinces are far worse.

The purpose of this article is not to look at the greater supply issues and the NRW challenges faced in the cities, but will look at the water use on the consumer side of the meter – particularly at schools.

Schools are large communities and the primary need for water is for healthy sanitation. The basic water consumption for the school’s operation is quite easily modelled based on the pupil and staff complement at the school. A study was conducted in 2004 for the Water Research Commission at a number of Gauteng schools. In the study the water usage in Ekurhuleni schools ranged between ~3 and 113 litres per learner per day, and the average was 23 litres/learner/day. Following a water saving initiative at the time that included repairing leaks, replacing washers, modernizing toilet cisterns to dual flush, replacing automatically flushing urinals with manually operated push button systems and replacing conventional taps with push button taps, the average water usage dropped to 12 litres/learner per day. There was quite a large range in perlearner consumption of water, but all schools successfully reduced their consumption.

School facilities and amenities are major drivers for the total water demand. Landscaping and sports field irrigation can be significant water users depending on the season and the rainfall pattern.

Sports fields, which are typically 6000m2 each, require 25 mm of precipitation per square metre per week during the growing season. This equates to ~ 600 kilolitres of water per field per month.  Thankfully, Gauteng is a summer rainfall area, and sports fields are not always dependant on the municipal supply.

Swimming pools are large users, or losers, of water. The typical 25-metre school swimming pool has a surface area of five hundred square meters and a volume of about 800 000 litres. The typical water evaporation rate in Gauteng is five millimetres per day. Five millimetres evaporation is five litres per square metre per day, i.e. 2.5 kilolitres per day from a typical outdoor 25-metre school pool. Swimming pool maintenance requires backwashing of the filtration system on a frequency dependant on the swimmer numbers and frequency will vary seasonally – typically it is a monthly requirement and will dispose of 15 kilolitres of water per occurrence.

So then, collating these benchmarks, we can build up an estimate for a monthly water usage profile of a school. Let’s take a look at a modelled day school with a learner complement of 900, and staff of 100; one grassed sports field; and an outdoor 25-metre swimming pool.

 

* In this simple model for now we assume no on-site boarding or live-in scholars.

Every school will have its only benchmark based on the facilities and the activities at the school. The benchmark illustrated here is probably a peak benchmark, and it will vary seasonally. The adage of what is measured can be managed, and comparing monthly water billing to a calculated benchmark will provide some comfort to the school of being under control or raise the alarm that there is water loss, and an associated cost.

Water is a vital resource but also a significant expense for schools and universities. Many educational institutions fail to realize how much cost they can save by reducing their water consumption and improving water management and efficiency.

Water and sewer tariffs are increasing and, no doubt, will start following the electricity escalation trend. Bear in mind that municipal billing assumes incoming water is also outgoing water, i.e. the sewer tariff is applied to the incoming water volume – water used for irrigation and loss due to evaporation is billed in the sewer billing.

Either way, this typically means schools and universities must expect to pay much higher rates for water and sewer services in years to come.

There is good news though. There are ways administrators can reduce or mitigate these cost increases. The answer is water efficiency.

Understanding Water Efficiency

Some of us may wonder what the difference is between water conservation and water efficiency. Water conservation refers to reducing consumption briefly, such as during a drought.

Water efficiency, on the other hand, means reducing water consumption permanently, often by turning to technologies designed to use less water. For example, the use of pool blankets /covers can assist in not only reducing evaporation losses, but also the loss of heat in the case of heated pools.

We should note that how water-efficient an organization is assessed to be can also be an indicator on the inherent efficiencies of the organization in other aspects of its operations.

Water waste and other environmental waste are signs of inefficiency in [an organisation’s] production and management.

How to Start

To start the process of using water more efficiently, administrators must collect two or three years of water utility bills to determine how much water the school uses and what it pays. Now, we have a benchmark against which to mark our progress. From here, we take the following steps:

Administrators should set water-reducing goals versus the theoretical benchmark discussed earlier in this paper. Water reduction over a defined period of time. Having goals helps keep the journey focused.

 

We reach those goals by conducting a water audit to determine exactly where water is being used on the campus.

 

With the audit completed, the deviations from the theoretical benchmark will highlight the areas of opportunities – for example, landscaping and restrooms.

Landscaping

Among the steps administrators can take to reduce water consumption for landscaping and vegetation, the following are noteworthy initiatives :

  • Install native vegetation. This refers to plants, trees, shrubs, and other vegetation customarily found in an area. 
  • Ensure plants are clustered; bunched together, they save water.
  •  Reduce mowing frequencies; set mower blades higher to help keep the soil below moister.
  • If sprinklers are installed, ensure they are on timers and do not irrigate nearby sidewalks and streets.

Restrooms

A few initiatives with toilets and urinals can bring surprisingly meaningful results. Newer dual-flush toilets are mandated to use 9 litres per flush or 5 litres per half flush. However, as toilets age and undergo repairs, they may use more than these amounts.

Administrators should replace toilets every six to seven years. This replacement will help ensure lower consumption, and many manufacturers are now making toilets that use less than the 9 litres of water per flush.

New urinals must use no more than 4 litres of water per flush. However, due to purchasing and cost factors and a desire to reduce water consumption even further, many facilities are taking the next step and installing waterless urinals.

These systems use no water, require less plumbing, do not require flush handles or sensory flush systems, and have few, if any, service requirements, all of which make them more cost-effective to install and use.

The Next Step is Yours

Let’s remember that there are ways to reduce water consumption in schools, universities, and all facilities. The technology is available and constantly improving. The next step is yours: take the steps discussed here and realise the savings.

 

 

Facing load shedding, South African businesses are turning to alternate and renewable energy solutions like grid-tied solar PV systems to reduce their carbon footprint and gain independence from the grid and pursue security of supply. Load shedding presents unique challenges to businesses already equipped with grid-tied only solar PV systems. This article briefly explores the intricate dynamics of how load shedding affects such grid-tied only solar PV systems.

Grid-tied solar PV systems are the most prevalent, simple, and cost-effective solution compared to off-grid and/or hybrid solar PV systems because they can operate without reliance on energy storage equipment. Grid-tied solar PV systems are simpler to install, realise attractive energy cost savings and are thus the most accessible option readily deployable for businesses.

A grid-tied Solar PV system is reliant on the grid’s availability to fully and properly serve the demands of a customer’s facility, meaning that when the grid-tied Solar PV system is not producing enough power to serve the attached load, supplemental power is then drawn from the grid to meet the total site electrical demand. Unfortunately, when the power fails from the utility’s side, the grid-tied Solar PV inverters will switch off for two reasons:

  • A grid-tied Solar PV inverter, which is a current-source device will have no reference voltage or grid to inject its power into, the solar PV inverters thus cannot operate. (A hybrid grid-forming Solar PV inverter by comparison is a voltage-source device and does not require to see or detect a grid to operate and will form its own grid without regard to the conditions of the attached equipment and any reliance on a grid interface).
  • Safety – if the utility is working on the upstream grid for repairs or maintenance, it cannot have connected energy sources from external systems touching the grid.

These technical requirements and capabilities impact businesses equipped with grid-tied only systems during loadshedding.

Many commercial and industrial (“C&I”) solar PV systems in South Africa are grid-tied. Converting these grid-tied solar PV systems to a hybrid solution is often technically and commercially challenging and requires full and careful consideration for the appropriate scoping of equipment sizing and capacity, along with a full and careful consideration for the type of electrical load at the business premises or facility.

South Africa experiences on average 4.0 to 6.3 hours of peak sunlight per day where PV modules generate the bulk of their output. The figure below shows a grid-tied solar PV system harnessing solar energy during daylight hours when the sun is shining and captures two instances of load shedding.

The impact of loadshedding and the consequential losses is most severe when load shedding takes place during peak solar generation hours.

The impact of load-shedding on these operations has in the past year (2023) shown an average overall impact and loss in energy production of about 20% and Eskom is unlikely to improve the situation in the short-term without a serious and continued intervention and integration of renewable and other energy generation sources into the national grid. Whilst the magnitude of loadshedding is well known, the unpredictable nature of load-shedding and the times in which it occurs makes accurate financial modelling and optimisation of battery solutions difficult and its related financed solutions challenging. Businesses are thus earnestly pursuing conversions to diesel generator integrated and/or battery storage solutions to still be able to harness the solar energy, realise the commercial benefit of the installation, and mitigate against these impacts.

In summary, loadshedding leads to a loss in productivity for grid-tied only solar PV installations and thereby compromised project financial returns. This means that backup sources of power like standby emergency diesel generators need to be purchased, increasing the consumption of fossil fuels, increasing the business’s exposure to volatile fuels costs, and contributing to environmental pollution. Investing in energy storage solutions like batteries to store surplus solar energy and provide backup power during grid outages is increasingly being considered as these storage costs also continue to decrease.

In conclusion, many businesses that have invested in grid-tied solar PV systems, had chosen a sustainable and cost-effective energy solution, realise energy cost reduction, and supplement their fossil fuel energy consumption with green energy. As early adopters of green and alternate energy they have realised the benefits of having made this move. However, during periods of load shedding, reliant on an always available grid, these businesses now find themselves at times incapacitated by the failing grid, disrupting operations and thus being compelled to augment their existing installations with energy storage and generator solutions at a greater expense and investment than originally planned.

As the need for renewable energy and sustainable practices increases every year, so does the need for more efficient and effective maintenance strategies of these technologies. In the solar industry, the solar panels are required to be free from dust, debris and other pollutants that could affect the performance and overall efficiency of the panels to generate electricity. This has led NrG to explore and pilot a nano-coating technology on a solar plant, with the aim to protect the solar panels without impacting their effectiveness and reducing the maintenance required.

1.     Hydrophobic

The research led us to understand more about the many advantageous properties that nano-coatings can display, such as being hydro- and oleo-phobic as well as hydrophilic. This means that the coating repels water and oils and provides an anti-stick surface. This is beneficial as it allows for the solar panels to dry quicker and guarantees that less water is needed to clean and maintain the panels. In addition, this characteristic ensures that the panels remain cleaner for longer as the liquid droplets will carry away pollutants, this is often referred to as the self-cleaning property[1]. An example of the hydrophobic water droplets can be seen in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: An example of hydrophobic properties[2]

2.     Anti-reflective

Furthermore, nano-coatings can have anti-reflective features, meaning that they are more effective in absorbing light[3]. This is useful as it reduces the reflection of light and enables better solar panel efficiency in low-lighting conditions. Thus, allowing for more energy generation during early mornings and late evenings.

3.     Repel Micro-organisms

The growth of micro-organisms such as moss, mould, and lichen can also be avoided through nano-coatings[4], which can prove favourable in places where there is high humidity and rainfall, further protecting the solar panels from extra damage. An example of moss growth can be seen in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2: Example of moss growth on a solar panel[5]

4.     Physical protection

Not only can nano-coatings exhibit all these properties, but it also acts as an extra physical layer of protection from etching, scratches, and surface degradation[6]. This is beneficial in extending the useful life of the solar panels and ensuring less damage from the external environment.

5.     Improved efficiencies and O&M cost

Studies have also shown that nano-coatings have helped to improve solar panel effectiveness and overall output power generation[7]. In addition, they have shown to decrease maintenance costs and reduce cleaning cycles[8].

6.     Pilot Project

In April this year, NrG undertook a nano-coating pilot project at a customer’s site using 200 solar panels, where 100 panels were coated with a nanomaterial. The remaining 100 panels were left uncoated as a baseline to evaluate against. NrG’s goal was to investigate whether these above-mentioned beneficial properties of the nano-coating technology can be utilised to have longer-lasting and more efficient solar plants. This pilot project will run for a year, after which NrG can justify the impact and performance of nano-coating and give recommendations for future solar sites. Figure 3 below, shows NrG’s freshly coated panels in a late afternoon sun.

Figure 3: NrG’s freshly coated panels in a late afternoon sun


[1] https://solartechadvisor.com/solar-panel-nano-coatings/

[2]https://www.google.com/search?q=hydrophilic+solar+panel&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjMjPT89dL3AhUS8hoKHURWC9cQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=hydrophilic+solar+panel&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoFCAAQgAQ6BggAEAgQHjoECAAQGDoECAAQHlCVC1izGmCKHmgAcAB4AIABuQOIAfwikgEHMi00LjUuNJgBAKABAaoBC2d3cy

[3] https://www.coating.com.au/solar-panel-coating-australia/

[4] http://blog.thesolarlabs.com/2020/11/05/nanotechnology-in-solar-energy/

[5] https://mossrooftreatment.com.au/roof-cleaning/solar-panels

[6] https://www.milkthesun.com/en/services/nanocoating

[7]Aljdaeh, E. et al., 2021. Performance Enhancement of Self-Cleaning Hydrophobic Nanocoated Photovoltaic Panels in a Dusty Environment. Energies, 14(20)

[8] Yadav, V. & Mishra, A., 2013. Role of Nanocoating in Maintaining Solar PV Efficiency: An Overview. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, pp. 21-28.

Digital economy technologies have undoubtedly altered the way people live their lives and operate their businesses. It has made businesses more efficient, from digital records and the resultant reduction in paper consumption, all the way to systems automation and Artificial Intelligence driving efficiency. 


Remote working has resulted in a downward shift in commercial electricity consumption, a reduction in commercial real estate, and less work-related travel. This bodes well for industry’s carbon emissions, and this shift has been facilitated almost exclusively by digital technologies.

Big tech, big power

Despite these hugely positive impacts, the complex systems that empower digitisation are not without environmental impact. Big tech is a notorious consumer of energy, owing to the large amounts of energy required to keep their servers cool. Tech firms invest significantly in efficient cooling technologies in order to keep these energy demands lower, but these remain considerable. 

In fact, according to the International Energy Agency, data centres alone account for 1.5% of global energy consumption, and 0.3% of global carbon emissions across the supply chain. Hearing that the Bitcoin Network demands more energy than the entire population of Finland, really brings these energy demands into perspective. 
As our reliance on digital technologies and cloud computing skyrockets, and Cryptomining surges, these statistics are almost guaranteed to increase.

Africa’s “Silicon Valley”

Despite falling behind in our digital transformation potential, South Africa is nonetheless poised to grow into Africa’s tech hub. Amazon’s recent announcement to establish a headquarters in Cape Town, has really catapulted this notion. Currently, Cape Town boasts 550 tech startups, employing over 40 000 people. R1.2 billion of Foreign Direct Investment has been earmarked for injection into the industry, the city is well on its way to becoming Africa’s “Silicon Valley”. 

South Africa’s population of connected individuals is growing quickly, and sub-Saharan Africa is the most rapidly growing region in the world in terms of “unique mobile subscribers”. The region has a large population of young, connected, digitally savvy consumers. So, unsurprisingly Africa has received keen interest from a number of Big Tech multinationals, as well as significant investment into digital technology infrastructure development. 

Given South Africa’s unreliable electricity situation, investment into the digital economy should also be coupled with innovative energy solutions if we are to leverage this opportunity effectively. NrG has

Commonplace pitfalls witnessed during delivery of Solar PV SSEG projects The renewable energy Solar PV Small Scale Embedded Generator (SSEG) Commercial and Industrial(C&I) sector is probably one of the busiest sectors of business in South Africa right now. It is a flurryof projects being developed and executed, supported by many programmes, incentives, andinvestment opportunities.At the same time, the C&I sector is very quickly developing into a mature and established market,with[…]